Pierce v. Kaufman County District Attorney Office et al | N.D. Texas | 09-27-2018 | www.anylaw.com (2024)

This case cites:

This case is cited by:

3:16-cv-02554-G-BH

2018 | Cited 0 times | N.D. Texas | September 27, 2018

Special Order No. 3-251 pro se

see also

See Macias v. Raul A. (Unknown), Badge No. 153 Id.

See

Id.

Id. Id.

See

Id. See

Hagwood v. Doe report and recommendation adopted sub nom. see also Land v. Stone Taylor v. Charter Med. Corp. See

Id. See

Id. Id.

in forma pauperis See Martin v. Scott in forma pauperis

sua sponte

Neitzke v. Williams Id.

Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly accord Ashcroft v. Iqbal

Livadas v. Bradshaw

See Flagg Bros., Inc. v. Brooks Cornish v. Corr. Servs. Corp.

Darby v. Pasadena Police Dep’t Darby Id. See, e.g., Delta Fuel Co., Inc. v. Maxwell Gage v. Valdez, adopted by

See Kentucky v. Graham

Neinast v. Texas Esteves v. Brock Quinn v. Roach

N. Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. Chatham County, Ga Alden v. Maine

See Curry v. Ellis Cnty., Tex.Pennhurst State Sch. & Hosp. v. Halderman

Kimel v. Fla. Bd. of Regents AT&T Communic’ns v. BellSouth Telecomms. Inc.

see Will v. Mich. Dep’t of State Police

Clark v. Tarrant Cnty., Tex. see also Wilson v. Burchett Clark Flores v. Ramirez

Yowman v. Jefferson Cnty. Cmty. Supervision & Corr. Dept. See Graham

respondeat superior See Bd. of Cnty. Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty. v. Brown Monell v. N.Y. Dep’t of Soc. Servs

Monell McClure v. Biesenbach

Hampton Co.

Respondeat superior Black’s Law Dictionary . See Prince v. Curry Brady v. Fort Bend County

Nat’l Sur., LLC v. Tunica County Cox v. City of Dallas Monell

Pembaur v. City of Cincinnati,

1. Official Policy or Custom

See Cox

Webster v. City of Houston accord Pineda v. City of Houston

Piotrowski v. City of Houston accord Peterson v. City of Fort Worth cert. denied Piotrowski Monell

Spiller v. City of Texas City, Police Dep’t Fraire v. City of Arlington Spiller

Spiller

Monell Id

See id

Id.

See id Spiller

See Spiller

See World Wide Street Preachers Fellowship v. Town of Columbia Pineda Piotrowski see also Hester v. Dallas Cty. Jail

adopted by

See Cox

2. Policymaker Groden v. City of Dallas not Id.

promulgated or ratified by the city’s policymaker

Id. Id.

See id. see also Mohamed for A.M. v. Irving Indep. Sch. Dist.

Groden

Groden See . See Groden respondeat superior Monell

City of St. Louis v. Praprotnik Groden Bolton v. City of Dallas Jett v. Dall. Indep. Sch. Dist. Praprotnik

See See Twombly Id.

The Wolters Kluwer Bouvier Law Dictionary Desk Edition

Klay v. United Healthgroup, Inc.

See Williams v. City of Irving, Texas rec. adopted sub nom. See Crook v. Galaviz Klay

See

See Douglass v. United Servs. Automobile Ass’n

Special Order No. 3-251 pro se

see also

See Macias v. Raul A. (Unknown), Badge No. 153 Id.

See

Id.

Id. Id.

See

Id. See

Hagwood v. Doe report and recommendation adopted sub nom. see also Land v. Stone Taylor v. Charter Med. Corp. See

Id. See

Id. Id.

in forma pauperis See Martin v. Scott in forma pauperis

sua sponte

Neitzke v. Williams Id.

Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly accord Ashcroft v. Iqbal

Livadas v. Bradshaw

See Flagg Bros., Inc. v. Brooks Cornish v. Corr. Servs. Corp.

Darby v. Pasadena Police Dep’t Darby Id. See, e.g., Delta Fuel Co., Inc. v. Maxwell Gage v. Valdez, adopted by

See Kentucky v. Graham

Neinast v. Texas Esteves v. Brock Quinn v. Roach

N. Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. Chatham County, Ga Alden v. Maine

See Curry v. Ellis Cnty., Tex.Pennhurst State Sch. & Hosp. v. Halderman

Kimel v. Fla. Bd. of Regents AT&T Communic’ns v. BellSouth Telecomms. Inc.

see Will v. Mich. Dep’t of State Police

Clark v. Tarrant Cnty., Tex. see also Wilson v. Burchett Clark Flores v. Ramirez

Yowman v. Jefferson Cnty. Cmty. Supervision & Corr. Dept. See Graham

respondeat superior See Bd. of Cnty. Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty. v. Brown Monell v. N.Y. Dep’t of Soc. Servs

Monell McClure v. Biesenbach

Hampton Co.

Respondeat superior Black’s Law Dictionary . See Prince v. Curry Brady v. Fort Bend County

Nat’l Sur., LLC v. Tunica County Cox v. City of Dallas Monell

Pembaur v. City of Cincinnati,

1. Official Policy or Custom

See Cox

Webster v. City of Houston accord Pineda v. City of Houston

Piotrowski v. City of Houston accord Peterson v. City of Fort Worth cert. denied Piotrowski Monell

Spiller v. City of Texas City, Police Dep’t Fraire v. City of Arlington Spiller

Spiller

Monell Id

See id

Id.

See id Spiller

See Spiller

See World Wide Street Preachers Fellowship v. Town of Columbia Pineda Piotrowski see also Hester v. Dallas Cty. Jail

adopted by

See Cox

2. Policymaker Groden v. City of Dallas not Id.

promulgated or ratified by the city’s policymaker

Id. Id.

See id. see also Mohamed for A.M. v. Irving Indep. Sch. Dist.

Groden

Groden See . See Groden respondeat superior Monell

City of St. Louis v. Praprotnik Groden Bolton v. City of Dallas Jett v. Dall. Indep. Sch. Dist. Praprotnik

See See Twombly Id.

The Wolters Kluwer Bouvier Law Dictionary Desk Edition

Klay v. United Healthgroup, Inc.

See Williams v. City of Irving, Texas rec. adopted sub nom. See Crook v. Galaviz Klay

See

See Douglass v. United Servs. Automobile Ass’n

Pierce v. Kaufman County District Attorney Office et al | N.D. Texas | 09-27-2018 | www.anylaw.com (2024)

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Jeremiah Abshire

Last Updated:

Views: 6632

Rating: 4.3 / 5 (54 voted)

Reviews: 85% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Jeremiah Abshire

Birthday: 1993-09-14

Address: Apt. 425 92748 Jannie Centers, Port Nikitaville, VT 82110

Phone: +8096210939894

Job: Lead Healthcare Manager

Hobby: Watching movies, Watching movies, Knapping, LARPing, Coffee roasting, Lacemaking, Gaming

Introduction: My name is Jeremiah Abshire, I am a outstanding, kind, clever, hilarious, curious, hilarious, outstanding person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.